Code review is the last line of defence before production. But human reviewers get tired, miss patterns, and bring their own biases.
Enter Claude AI — a context-aware assistant that can review Laravel pull requests for:
- 🔐 Security vulnerabilities
- 🎯 Style and architectural consistency
- ⚙️ Performance issues (N+1 queries, eager loading)
- 🧠 Anti-patterns and maintainability risks
This blog shows how Claude can become your Laravel team’s AI-powered reviewer, catching mechanical issues so humans can focus on design and business logic.
🤖 Why Use Claude for Laravel Code Reviews?
Claude doesn’t replace human judgment — it augments it.
Claude excels at:
- Parsing large diffs and spotting repetitive mistakes
- Enforcing PSR-12 and Laravel conventions
- Suggesting safer alternatives for risky code
- Flagging missing authorization, validation, or error handling
Claude struggles with:
- Business logic decisions
- Context across multiple PRs or tickets
- Subjective design debates
So the ideal workflow is:
Claude handles the mechanical. Humans handle the meaningful.
🛠️ Setup: Claude in Your Laravel PR Workflow
You can integrate Claude via:
- GitHub Actions (e.g. claude-code-security-review)
- Claude API + custom CI/CD scripts
- Claude in Slack or Claude in Chrome for ad-hoc reviews
Recommended setup:
- Trigger Claude on every PR
- Feed it the diff + relevant context (models, policies, routes)
- Ask for structured feedback: security, style, performance, readability
🧪 Example: Before vs After Claude Review
PR Diff (Before)
public function store(Request $request)
{
$invoice = new Invoice;
$invoice->amount = $request->amount;
$invoice->status = 'pending';
$invoice->user_id = auth()->id();
$invoice->save();
return redirect('/invoices');
}
Claude Feedback
- ❌ No validation — user could submit invalid data
- ❌ No authorization check — any user can create invoices
- ❌ Hardcoded status — should use enum or config
- ✅ Suggests using
Invoice::create()for brevity
PR Diff (After)
public function store(Request $request)
{
$this->authorize('create', Invoice::class);
$validated = $request->validate([
'amount' => 'required|numeric|min:0',
]);
Invoice::create([
'amount' => $validated['amount'],
'status' => InvoiceStatus::PENDING,
'user_id' => auth()->id(),
]);
return redirect()->route('invoices.index');
}
Claude’s suggestions improved:
- ✅ Security (authorization)
- ✅ Data integrity (validation)
- ✅ Maintainability (enum usage)
- ✅ Readability (shorter code)
🔐 Security Checks Claude Can Catch
Claude is especially good at spotting Laravel-specific security gaps:
- Missing
authorize()calls - Unvalidated
$requestusage - Direct access to sensitive models without policies
- Unsafe query building (e.g. raw SQL injection risks)
- CSRF or session misuse in custom middleware
You can prompt Claude with:
“Review this Laravel controller for security risks and suggest improvements.”
🎯 Style Enforcement With Claude
Claude can enforce:
- PSR-12 formatting
- Consistent naming (
storeInvoice()vscreate()) - Blade best practices (
@foreachvs@each) - Route naming conventions (
invoices.indexvs/invoices) - Service layer separation (controller vs business logic)
Example Prompt:
“Review this Laravel controller for style and architectural consistency. Suggest improvements.”
⚙️ Performance Checks
Claude can flag:
- N+1 query risks
- Missing eager loading (
with()) - Inefficient pagination
- Unindexed filters
- Overuse of
get()vscursor()
Example Prompt:
“Review this Laravel model and controller for performance issues. Focus on query optimization.”
📈 Impact Plan
Claude as a Laravel code reviewer improves:
| Area | Impact |
|---|---|
| Security | Flags missing auth, validation, unsafe code |
| Code Quality | Enforces style, naming, architecture |
| Performance | Catches N+1, eager loading issues |
| Developer Speed | Reduces review fatigue, speeds up PRs |
| Team Consistency | Standardizes practices across contributors |
Final Thoughts
Claude AI is not a silver bullet — but it’s a powerful reviewer for Laravel teams.
Use it to catch what humans miss:
- Mechanical mistakes
- Style violations
- Security gaps
- Performance issues
Let Claude handle the repetitive.
Let your team focus on what matters.
